| | | | | | |

Ryzen 9 5950X vs Core i3-6100


Description
The 5950X is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i3-6100 is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5950X gets a score of 1081 k points while the i3-6100 gets 112.3 k points.

Summarizing, the 5950X is 9.6 times faster than the i3-6100 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a20f10
506e3
Core
Vermeer
Skylake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.9 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
16/32
2/2
TDP
105 W
51 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
16x32+16x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
16x512 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
2x32768 kB
4096 kB
Date
November 2020
September 2015
Mean monothread perf.
87.3k points
52.84k points
Mean multithread perf.
1080.96k points
112.28k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5950X
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
22.91k
22.89k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
26.24k
21.04k (x0.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.87k
4.9k (x0.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
26.28k
4.01k (x0.15)
TOTAL
87.3k
52.84k (x0.61)

Multithread

5950X

i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
359.17k
50.05k (x0.14)
Test#2 (FP)
479.04k
47.13k (x0.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
214.59k
11.38k (x0.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
28.16k
3.72k (x0.13)
TOTAL
1080.96k
112.28k (x0.1)

Performance/W
5950X
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
3421 points/W
981 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4562 points/W
924 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2044 points/W
223 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
268 points/W
73 points/W
TOTAL
10295 points/W
2202 points/W

Performance/GHz
5950X
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
4676 points/GHz
6187 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5355 points/GHz
5686 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2423 points/GHz
1325 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5363 points/GHz
1084 points/GHz
TOTAL
17817 points/GHz
14282 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4