| | | | | | |

Ryzen 9 5950X vs Core i7-13700HX


Description
The 5950X is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i7-13700HX is based on Raptor Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5950X gets a score of 1081 k points while the i7-13700HX gets 1070.4 k points.

Summarizing, the 5950X is 1 times faster than the i7-13700HX. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a20f10
b06f2
Core
Vermeer
Raptor Lake-HX
Architecture
Zen 3
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.9 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1964
Cores/Threads
16/32
16/24
TDP
105 W
55 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
16x32+16x32 kB
8x32/8x64+8x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
16x512 kB
8x2048/2x4096 kB
Cache L3
2x32768 kB
30720 kB
Date
November 2020
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
87.3k points
109.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
1080.96k points
1070.39k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5950X
i7-13700HX
Test#1 (Integers)
22.91k
48.57k (x2.12)
Test#2 (FP)
26.24k
28.78k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.87k
15.6k (x1.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
26.28k
16.46k (x0.63)
TOTAL
87.3k
109.41k (x1.25)

Multithread

5950X

i7-13700HX
Test#1 (Integers)
359.17k
486.01k (x1.35)
Test#2 (FP)
479.04k
386.1k (x0.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
214.59k
173.21k (x0.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
28.16k
25.08k (x0.89)
TOTAL
1080.96k
1070.39k (x0.99)

Performance/W
5950X
i7-13700HX
Test#1 (Integers)
3421 points/W
8836 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4562 points/W
7020 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2044 points/W
3149 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
268 points/W
456 points/W
TOTAL
10295 points/W
19462 points/W

Performance/GHz
5950X
i7-13700HX
Test#1 (Integers)
4676 points/GHz
9715 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5355 points/GHz
5755 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2423 points/GHz
3120 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5363 points/GHz
3293 points/GHz
TOTAL
17817 points/GHz
21882 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4