| | | | | | |

Ryzen 9 5900X vs 5900HS


Description
Both models 5900X and 5900HS are based on Zen 3 architecture.

Zen 3 uses TSMC’s 7nm process, still uses the AM4 socket and has up yo 32MB of L3 cache per CCX.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5900X gets a score of 816 k points while the 5900HS gets 435 k points.

Summarizing, the 5900X is 1.9 times faster than the 5900HS. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a20f12
a50f00
Core
Vermeer
Cezanne
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
12/24
8/16
TDP
105 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
12x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
2x32768 kB
16384 kB
Date
November 2020
December 2021
Mean monothread perf.
83.42k points
81.87k points
Mean multithread perf.
816.01k points
434.96k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5900X
5900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
22.58k
21.2k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
24.83k
25k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.23k
11.44k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.78k
24.22k (x0.98)
TOTAL
83.42k
81.87k (x0.98)

Multithread

5900X

5900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
259.31k
145.13k (x0.56)
Test#2 (FP)
343.12k
198.36k (x0.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
155.92k
85.67k (x0.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
57.66k
5.79k (x0.1)
TOTAL
816.01k
434.96k (x0.53)

Performance/W
5900X
5900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
2470 points/W
4147 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3268 points/W
5667 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1485 points/W
2448 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
549 points/W
166 points/W
TOTAL
7772 points/W
12427 points/W

Performance/GHz
5900X
5900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
4704 points/GHz
4608 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5172 points/GHz
5436 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2340 points/GHz
2488 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5163 points/GHz
5266 points/GHz
TOTAL
17379 points/GHz
17797 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4