| | | | | | |

Ryzen 9 5900X vs Core i7-13700HX


Description
The 5900X is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i7-13700HX is based on Raptor Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5900X gets a score of 816 k points while the i7-13700HX gets 1070.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-13700HX is 1.3 times faster than the 5900X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a20f12
b06f2
Core
Vermeer
Raptor Lake-HX
Architecture
Zen 3
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1964
Cores/Threads
12/24
16/24
TDP
105 W
55 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
8x32/8x64+8x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
12x512 kB
8x2048/2x4096 kB
Cache L3
2x32768 kB
30720 kB
Date
November 2020
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
83.42k points
109.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
816.01k points
1070.39k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5900X
i7-13700HX
Test#1 (Integers)
22.58k
48.57k (x2.15)
Test#2 (FP)
24.83k
28.78k (x1.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.23k
15.6k (x1.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.78k
16.46k (x0.66)
TOTAL
83.42k
109.41k (x1.31)

Multithread

5900X

i7-13700HX
Test#1 (Integers)
259.31k
486.01k (x1.87)
Test#2 (FP)
343.12k
386.1k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
155.92k
173.21k (x1.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
57.66k
25.08k (x0.43)
TOTAL
816.01k
1070.39k (x1.31)

Performance/W
5900X
i7-13700HX
Test#1 (Integers)
2470 points/W
8836 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3268 points/W
7020 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1485 points/W
3149 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
549 points/W
456 points/W
TOTAL
7772 points/W
19462 points/W

Performance/GHz
5900X
i7-13700HX
Test#1 (Integers)
4704 points/GHz
9715 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5172 points/GHz
5755 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2340 points/GHz
3120 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5163 points/GHz
3293 points/GHz
TOTAL
17379 points/GHz
21882 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4