Ryzen 9 5900X vs Core i9-11900K
Description
The 5900X is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i9-11900K is based on Rocket Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5900X gets a score of 816 k points while the i9-11900K gets 748 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900X is 1.1 times faster than the i9-11900K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5900X gets a score of 816 k points while the i9-11900K gets 748 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900X is 1.1 times faster than the i9-11900K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a20f12
a0671
Core
Vermeer
Rocket Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
5.3 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
12/24
8/16
TDP
105 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
12x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
2x32768 kB
16386 kB
Date
November 2020
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
83.42k points
101.11k points
Mean multithread perf.
816.01k points
748.02k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5900X
i9-11900K
Test#1 (Integers)
22.58k
36.08k (x1.6)
Test#2 (FP)
24.83k
30.19k (x1.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.23k
12.96k (x1.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
24.78k
21.88k (x0.88)
TOTAL
83.42k
101.11k (x1.21)
Multithread
5900X
i9-11900K
Test#1 (Integers)
259.31k
311.76k (x1.2)
Test#2 (FP)
343.12k
314.01k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
155.92k
112.23k (x0.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
57.66k
10.02k (x0.17)
TOTAL
816.01k
748.02k (x0.92)
Performance/W
5900X
i9-11900K
Test#1 (Integers)
2470 points/W
2494 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3268 points/W
2512 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1485 points/W
898 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
549 points/W
80 points/W
TOTAL
7772 points/W
5984 points/W
Performance/GHz
5900X
i9-11900K
Test#1 (Integers)
4704 points/GHz
6807 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5172 points/GHz
5695 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2340 points/GHz
2446 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5163 points/GHz
4129 points/GHz
TOTAL
17379 points/GHz
19077 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4