| | | | | | |

Ryzen 9 4900HS vs Ryzen 5 5500


Description
The 4900HS is based on Zen 2 architecture while the 5500 is based on Zen 3.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4900HS gets a score of 360.6 k points while the 5500 gets 373 k points.

Summarizing, the 5500 is 1 times faster than the 4900HS. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
860f01
a50f00
Core
Renoir
Cezanne
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
16384 kB
Date
March 2020
April 2022
Mean monothread perf.
53k points
80.52k points
Mean multithread perf.
360.57k points
373.05k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4900HS
5500
Test#1 (Integers)
14.87k
22.09k (x1.49)
Test#2 (FP)
21.53k
24.59k (x1.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.39k
10.94k (x1.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.21k
22.89k (x2.79)
TOTAL
53k
80.52k (x1.52)

Multithread

4900HS

5500
Test#1 (Integers)
124.63k
124.44k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
158.62k
167.06k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
69.79k
74.34k (x1.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.53k
7.2k (x0.96)
TOTAL
360.57k
373.05k (x1.03)

Performance/W
4900HS
5500
Test#1 (Integers)
3561 points/W
1914 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4532 points/W
2570 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1994 points/W
1144 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
215 points/W
111 points/W
TOTAL
10302 points/W
5739 points/W

Performance/GHz
4900HS
5500
Test#1 (Integers)
3457 points/GHz
5261 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5007 points/GHz
5855 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1952 points/GHz
2604 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1910 points/GHz
5451 points/GHz
TOTAL
12326 points/GHz
19170 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4