Ryzen 9 4900HS vs Core i5-1335U
Description
The 4900HS is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i5-1335U is based on Raptor Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4900HS gets a score of 360.6 k points while the i5-1335U gets 282.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 4900HS is 1.3 times faster than the i5-1335U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4900HS gets a score of 360.6 k points while the i5-1335U gets 282.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 4900HS is 1.3 times faster than the i5-1335U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
860f01
b06a3
Core
Renoir
Raptor Lake-U
Base frecuency
3 GHz
1.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
8/16
10/12
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
2x32/8x64+2x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
2x1280/2x2048 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
12288 kB
Date
March 2020
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
53k points
92.46k points
Mean multithread perf.
360.57k points
282.25k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4900HS
i5-1335U
Test#1 (Integers)
14.87k
37.94k (x2.55)
Test#2 (FP)
21.53k
26.18k (x1.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.39k
13.86k (x1.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.21k
14.48k (x1.76)
TOTAL
53k
92.46k (x1.74)
Multithread
4900HS
i5-1335U
Test#1 (Integers)
124.63k
125.7k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
158.62k
93.63k (x0.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
69.79k
46.18k (x0.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.53k
16.75k (x2.22)
TOTAL
360.57k
282.25k (x0.78)
Performance/W
4900HS
i5-1335U
Test#1 (Integers)
3561 points/W
8380 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4532 points/W
6242 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1994 points/W
3079 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
215 points/W
1117 points/W
TOTAL
10302 points/W
18817 points/W
Performance/GHz
4900HS
i5-1335U
Test#1 (Integers)
3457 points/GHz
8248 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5007 points/GHz
5692 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1952 points/GHz
3013 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1910 points/GHz
3147 points/GHz
TOTAL
12326 points/GHz
20100 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4