Ryzen 9 4900HS vs Core i5-11400F
Description
The 4900HS is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i5-11400F is based on Rocket Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4900HS gets a score of 360.6 k points while the i5-11400F gets 495.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-11400F is 1.4 times faster than the 4900HS. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4900HS gets a score of 360.6 k points while the i5-11400F gets 495.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-11400F is 1.4 times faster than the 4900HS. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
860f01
a0671
Core
Renoir
Rocket Lake-S
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32+6x48 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
12288 kB
Date
March 2020
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
53k points
88.34k points
Mean multithread perf.
360.57k points
495.65k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4900HS
i5-11400F
Test#1 (Integers)
14.87k
31.66k (x2.13)
Test#2 (FP)
21.53k
26.21k (x1.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.39k
11.96k (x1.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.21k
18.5k (x2.25)
TOTAL
53k
88.34k (x1.67)
Multithread
4900HS
i5-11400F
Test#1 (Integers)
124.63k
210.36k (x1.69)
Test#2 (FP)
158.62k
203.84k (x1.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
69.79k
72.05k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.53k
9.4k (x1.25)
TOTAL
360.57k
495.65k (x1.37)
Performance/W
4900HS
i5-11400F
Test#1 (Integers)
3561 points/W
3236 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4532 points/W
3136 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1994 points/W
1108 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
215 points/W
145 points/W
TOTAL
10302 points/W
7625 points/W
Performance/GHz
4900HS
i5-11400F
Test#1 (Integers)
3457 points/GHz
7196 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5007 points/GHz
5957 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1952 points/GHz
2718 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1910 points/GHz
4205 points/GHz
TOTAL
12326 points/GHz
20076 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4