Ryzen 9 3900 vs Core i9-9880H
Description
The 3900 is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i9-9880H is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3900 gets a score of 687.5 k points while the i9-9880H gets 381.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 3900 is 1.8 times faster than the i9-9880H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3900 gets a score of 687.5 k points while the i9-9880H gets 381.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 3900 is 1.8 times faster than the i9-9880H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
870f10
906ed
Core
Matisse
Coffee Lake-H
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
12/24
8/16
TDP
65 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
12x32+12x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
12x512 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
4x16384 kB
16386 kB
Date
September 2019
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
74.97k points
73.53k points
Mean multithread perf.
687.5k points
381.53k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3900
i9-9880H
Test#1 (Integers)
16.85k
27.81k (x1.65)
Test#2 (FP)
26.03k
25.88k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.54k
5.65k (x0.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.55k
14.19k (x0.63)
TOTAL
74.97k
73.53k (x0.98)
Multithread
3900
i9-9880H
Test#1 (Integers)
229.41k
175.69k (x0.77)
Test#2 (FP)
292.81k
166.56k (x0.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
128.48k
35.04k (x0.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
36.8k
4.23k (x0.12)
TOTAL
687.5k
381.53k (x0.55)
Performance/W
3900
i9-9880H
Test#1 (Integers)
3529 points/W
3904 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4505 points/W
3701 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1977 points/W
779 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
566 points/W
94 points/W
TOTAL
10577 points/W
8478 points/W
Performance/GHz
3900
i9-9880H
Test#1 (Integers)
3920 points/GHz
5793 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6054 points/GHz
5392 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2218 points/GHz
1178 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5243 points/GHz
2956 points/GHz
TOTAL
17435 points/GHz
15319 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4