Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE vs Core i5-12500H
Description
The 4750GE is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i5-12500H is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4750GE gets a score of 469.7 k points while the i5-12500H gets 225.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 4750GE is 2.1 times faster than the i5-12500H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4750GE gets a score of 469.7 k points while the i5-12500H gets 225.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 4750GE is 2.1 times faster than the i5-12500H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
860f01
906a3
Core
Renoir
Alder Lake-H
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
8/16
12/16
TDP
35 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32/8X64+4x48/8X32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x1280/2x2048 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
18432 kB
Date
July 2020
February 2022
Mean monothread perf.
60.99k points
58.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
469.67k points
225.65k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4750GE
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
16.95k
22.61k (x1.33)
Test#2 (FP)
26.26k
17.73k (x0.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.4k
9.63k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.38k
8.4k (x1)
TOTAL
60.99k
58.37k (x0.96)
Multithread
4750GE
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
159.87k
85.49k (x0.53)
Test#2 (FP)
215.44k
94.93k (x0.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
88.45k
39.15k (x0.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.9k
6.08k (x1.03)
TOTAL
469.67k
225.65k (x0.48)
Performance/W
4750GE
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
4568 points/W
1900 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6155 points/W
2110 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2527 points/W
870 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
169 points/W
135 points/W
TOTAL
13419 points/W
5014 points/W
Performance/GHz
4750GE
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
3942 points/GHz
5025 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6107 points/GHz
3939 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2185 points/GHz
2139 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1950 points/GHz
1867 points/GHz
TOTAL
14184 points/GHz
12971 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4