Ryzen 7 7840HS vs Xeon E5-2680 v4
Description
The 7840HS is based on Zen 4 architecture while the E5-2680 v4 is based on Broadwell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7840HS gets a score of 622.3 k points while the E5-2680 v4 gets 1162.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2680 v4 is 1.9 times faster than the 7840HS. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7840HS gets a score of 622.3 k points while the E5-2680 v4 gets 1162.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2680 v4 is 1.9 times faster than the 7840HS. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a70f41
406f1
Core
Phoenix
Broadwell-EP
Base frecuency
3.8 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.1 GHz
3.3 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP7r2
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
8/16
14/28
TDP
35 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
14x32+14x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
14x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
35840 kB
Date
January 2023
March 2016
Mean monothread perf.
91.11k points
41.35k points
Mean multithread perf.
622.34k points
1162.63k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
7840HS
E5-2680 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
31.57k
17.8k (x0.56)
Test#2 (FP)
25.2k
16.51k (x0.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.42k
4.47k (x0.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.93k
2.56k (x0.12)
TOTAL
91.11k
41.35k (x0.45)
Multithread
7840HS
E5-2680 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
265.26k
494.82k (x1.87)
Test#2 (FP)
226.13k
514.13k (x2.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
114.46k
132.87k (x1.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.49k
20.8k (x1.26)
TOTAL
622.34k
1162.63k (x1.87)
Performance/W
7840HS
E5-2680 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
7579 points/W
4124 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6461 points/W
4284 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3270 points/W
1107 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
471 points/W
173 points/W
TOTAL
17781 points/W
9689 points/W
Performance/GHz
7840HS
E5-2680 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
6190 points/GHz
5393 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4941 points/GHz
5004 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2436 points/GHz
1355 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4299 points/GHz
777 points/GHz
TOTAL
17866 points/GHz
12529 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4