| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 7840HS vs Core i7-11800H (ES)


Description
The 7840HS is based on Zen 4 architecture while the i7-11800H (ES) is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7840HS gets a score of 622.3 k points while the i7-11800H (ES) gets 709.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-11800H (ES) is 1.1 times faster than the 7840HS. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a70f41
806d0
Core
Phoenix
Tiger Lake-H
Architecture
Zen 4
Base frecuency
3.8 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.1 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP7r2
BGA 1787
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
35 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
8x1280 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
24576 kB
Date
January 2023
May 2021
Mean monothread perf.
91.11k points
81.62k points
Mean multithread perf.
622.34k points
709.85k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
7840HS
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
31.57k
30.84k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
25.2k
26.38k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.42k
12.66k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.93k
11.74k (x0.54)
TOTAL
91.11k
81.62k (x0.9)

Multithread

7840HS

i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
265.26k
294.86k (x1.11)
Test#2 (FP)
226.13k
280.92k (x1.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
114.46k
113.9k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.49k
20.16k (x1.22)
TOTAL
622.34k
709.85k (x1.14)

Performance/W
7840HS
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
7579 points/W
6553 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6461 points/W
6243 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3270 points/W
2531 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
471 points/W
448 points/W
TOTAL
17781 points/W
15774 points/W

Performance/GHz
7840HS
i7-11800H (ES)
Test#1 (Integers)
6190 points/GHz
6705 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4941 points/GHz
5734 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2436 points/GHz
2752 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4299 points/GHz
2552 points/GHz
TOTAL
17866 points/GHz
17744 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4