| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 7840HS vs Engineering Sample 906ED 2.1GHz


Description
The 7840HS is based on Zen 4 architecture while the 906ED 2.1GHz is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7840HS gets a score of 622.3 k points while the 906ED 2.1GHz gets 657.2 k points.

Summarizing, the 906ED 2.1GHz is 1.1 times faster than the 7840HS. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a70f41
906ed
Core
Phoenix
Comet Lake-H
Architecture
Zen 4
Base frecuency
3.8 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.1 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP7r2
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
35 W
- W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
16384 kB
Date
January 2023
March 2020
Mean monothread perf.
91.11k points
86.65k points
Mean multithread perf.
622.34k points
657.19k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
7840HS
906ED 2.1GHz
Test#1 (Integers)
31.57k
33.92k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
25.2k
30k (x1.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.42k
7.01k (x0.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.93k
15.73k (x0.72)
TOTAL
91.11k
86.65k (x0.95)

Multithread

7840HS

906ED 2.1GHz
Test#1 (Integers)
265.26k
302.78k (x1.14)
Test#2 (FP)
226.13k
278.98k (x1.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
114.46k
67.89k (x0.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.49k
7.53k (x0.46)
TOTAL
622.34k
657.19k (x1.06)

Performance/W
7840HS
906ED 2.1GHz
Test#1 (Integers)
7579 points/W