Ryzen 7 7840HS vs 5800X3D
Description
The 7840HS is based on Zen 4 architecture while the 5800X3D is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7840HS gets a score of 622.3 k points while the 5800X3D gets 631.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 5800X3D is 1 times faster than the 7840HS. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7840HS gets a score of 622.3 k points while the 5800X3D gets 631.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 5800X3D is 1 times faster than the 7840HS. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a70f41
a20f12
Core
Phoenix
Vermeer
Base frecuency
3.8 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.1 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP7r2
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
35 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
98304 kB
Date
January 2023
April 2022
Mean monothread perf.
91.11k points
83.1k points
Mean multithread perf.
622.34k points
631.14k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
7840HS
5800X3D
Test#1 (Integers)
31.57k
22.59k (x0.72)
Test#2 (FP)
25.2k
24.32k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.42k
11.32k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.93k
24.86k (x1.13)
TOTAL
91.11k
83.1k (x0.91)
Multithread
7840HS
5800X3D
Test#1 (Integers)
265.26k
181.41k (x0.68)
Test#2 (FP)
226.13k
236.12k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
114.46k
105.13k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.49k
108.48k (x6.58)
TOTAL
622.34k
631.14k (x1.01)
Performance/W
7840HS
5800X3D
Test#1 (Integers)
7579 points/W
1728 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6461 points/W
2249 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3270 points/W
1001 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
471 points/W
1033 points/W
TOTAL
17781 points/W
6011 points/W
Performance/GHz
7840HS
5800X3D
Test#1 (Integers)
6190 points/GHz
5020 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4941 points/GHz
5405 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2436 points/GHz
2517 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4299 points/GHz
5525 points/GHz
TOTAL
17866 points/GHz
18467 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4