Ryzen 7 7840HS vs Ryzen 5 3600X
Description
The 7840HS is based on Zen 4 architecture while the 3600X is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7840HS gets a score of 622.3 k points while the 3600X gets 376.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 7840HS is 1.7 times faster than the 3600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7840HS gets a score of 622.3 k points while the 3600X gets 376.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 7840HS is 1.7 times faster than the 3600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a70f41
870f10
Core
Phoenix
Matisse
Base frecuency
3.8 GHz
3.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.1 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP7r2
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
35 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
2x16384 kB
Date
January 2023
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
91.11k points
69.9k points
Mean multithread perf.
622.34k points
376.22k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
7840HS
3600X
Test#1 (Integers)
31.57k
16.21k (x0.51)
Test#2 (FP)
25.2k
22.99k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.42k
8.76k (x0.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.93k
21.94k (x1)
TOTAL
91.11k
69.9k (x0.77)
Multithread
7840HS
3600X
Test#1 (Integers)
265.26k
121.94k (x0.46)
Test#2 (FP)
226.13k
153.22k (x0.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
114.46k
67.74k (x0.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.49k
33.31k (x2.02)
TOTAL
622.34k
376.22k (x0.6)
Performance/W
7840HS
3600X
Test#1 (Integers)
7579 points/W
1284 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6461 points/W
1613 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3270 points/W
713 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
471 points/W
351 points/W
TOTAL
17781 points/W
3960 points/W
Performance/GHz
7840HS
3600X
Test#1 (Integers)
6190 points/GHz
3685 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4941 points/GHz
5225 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2436 points/GHz
1991 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4299 points/GHz
4986 points/GHz
TOTAL
17866 points/GHz
15887 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4