| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 7840HS vs Core i7-13700T


Description
The 7840HS is based on Zen 4 architecture while the i7-13700T is based on Raptor Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7840HS gets a score of 622.3 k points while the i7-13700T gets 951.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-13700T is 1.5 times faster than the 7840HS. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a70f41
b0671
Core
Phoenix
Raptor Lake-S
Architecture
Zen 4
Zen 4
Base frecuency
3.8 GHz
1.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.1 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP7r2
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
8/16
16/24
TDP
35 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32/8x64+8x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
8x2048/2x4096 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
30720 kB
Date
January 2023
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
91.11k points
107.15k points
Mean multithread perf.
622.34k points
951.3k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
7840HS
i7-13700T
Test#1 (Integers)
31.57k
46.53k (x1.47)
Test#2 (FP)
25.2k
28.48k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.42k
15.08k (x1.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.93k
17.07k (x0.78)
TOTAL
91.11k
107.15k (x1.18)

Multithread

7840HS

i7-13700T
Test#1 (Integers)
265.26k
443.98k (x1.67)
Test#2 (FP)
226.13k
343.34k (x1.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
114.46k
147.61k (x1.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.49k
16.36k (x0.99)
TOTAL
622.34k
951.3k (x1.53)

Performance/W
7840HS
i7-13700T
Test#1 (Integers)
7579 points/W
12685 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6461 points/W
9810 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3270 points/W
4217 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
471 points/W
468 points/W
TOTAL
17781 points/W
27180 points/W

Performance/GHz
7840HS
i7-13700T
Test#1 (Integers)
6190 points/GHz
9496 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4941 points/GHz
5812 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2436 points/GHz
3077 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4299 points/GHz
3483 points/GHz
TOTAL
17866 points/GHz
21868 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4