| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 7840HS vs Core i5-1335U


Description
The 7840HS is based on Zen 4 architecture while the i5-1335U is based on Raptor Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7840HS gets a score of 622.3 k points while the i5-1335U gets 282.2 k points.

Summarizing, the 7840HS is 2.2 times faster than the i5-1335U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a70f41
b06a3
Core
Phoenix
Raptor Lake-U
Architecture
Zen 4
Zen 4
Base frecuency
3.8 GHz
1.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.1 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP7r2
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
8/16
10/12
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
2x32/8x64+2x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
2x1280/2x2048 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2023
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
91.11k points
92.46k points
Mean multithread perf.
622.34k points
282.25k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
7840HS
i5-1335U
Test#1 (Integers)
31.57k
37.94k (x1.2)
Test#2 (FP)
25.2k
26.18k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.42k
13.86k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.93k
14.48k (x0.66)
TOTAL
91.11k
92.46k (x1.01)

Multithread

7840HS

i5-1335U
Test#1 (Integers)
265.26k
125.7k (x0.47)
Test#2 (FP)
226.13k
93.63k (x0.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
114.46k
46.18k (x0.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.49k
16.75k (x1.02)
TOTAL
622.34k
282.25k (x0.45)

Performance/W
7840HS
i5-1335U
Test#1 (Integers)
7579 points/W
8380 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6461 points/W
6242 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3270 points/W
3079 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
471 points/W
1117 points/W
TOTAL
17781 points/W
18817 points/W

Performance/GHz
7840HS
i5-1335U
Test#1 (Integers)
6190 points/GHz
8248 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4941 points/GHz
5692 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2436 points/GHz
3013 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4299 points/GHz
3147 points/GHz
TOTAL
17866 points/GHz
20100 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4