| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 7840HS vs Core i3-13100F


Description
The 7840HS is based on Zen 4 architecture while the i3-13100F is based on Raptor Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7840HS gets a score of 622.3 k points while the i3-13100F gets 390.2 k points.

Summarizing, the 7840HS is 1.6 times faster than the i3-13100F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a70f41
b06f5
Core
Phoenix
Raptor Lake-S
Architecture
Zen 4
Zen 4
Base frecuency
3.8 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.1 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP7r2
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
35 W
58 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2023
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
91.11k points
100.94k points
Mean multithread perf.
622.34k points
390.23k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
7840HS
i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
31.57k
47.14k (x1.49)
Test#2 (FP)
25.2k
25.77k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.42k
13.25k (x1.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.93k
14.77k (x0.67)
TOTAL
91.11k
100.94k (x1.11)

Multithread

7840HS

i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
265.26k
168.51k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
226.13k
142.8k (x0.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
114.46k
63.57k (x0.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.49k
15.34k (x0.93)
TOTAL
622.34k
390.23k (x0.63)

Performance/W
7840HS
i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
7579 points/W
2905 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6461 points/W
2462 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3270 points/W
1096 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
471 points/W
264 points/W
TOTAL
17781 points/W
6728 points/W

Performance/GHz
7840HS
i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
6190 points/GHz
10476 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4941 points/GHz
5728 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2436 points/GHz
2945 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4299 points/GHz
3283 points/GHz
TOTAL
17866 points/GHz
22432 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4