Ryzen 7 7840HS vs Core i7-12700H
Description
The 7840HS is based on Zen 4 architecture while the i7-12700H is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7840HS gets a score of 622.3 k points while the i7-12700H gets 643.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-12700H is 1 times faster than the 7840HS. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7840HS gets a score of 622.3 k points while the i7-12700H gets 643.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-12700H is 1 times faster than the 7840HS. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a70f41
906a3
Core
Phoenix
Alder Lake-H
Base frecuency
3.8 GHz
4.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.1 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP7r2
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
8/16
14/20
TDP
35 W
115 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32/8x64+6x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
6x1280+6x2048 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
24576 kB
Date
January 2023
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
91.11k points
93.12k points
Mean multithread perf.
622.34k points
643.29k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
7840HS
i7-12700H
Test#1 (Integers)
31.57k
41.64k (x1.32)
Test#2 (FP)
25.2k
25.48k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.42k
13.2k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.93k
12.8k (x0.58)
TOTAL
91.11k
93.12k (x1.02)
Multithread
7840HS
i7-12700H
Test#1 (Integers)
265.26k
276.56k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
226.13k
251.6k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
114.46k
104.55k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.49k
10.58k (x0.64)
TOTAL
622.34k
643.29k (x1.03)
Performance/W
7840HS
i7-12700H
Test#1 (Integers)
7579 points/W
2405 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6461 points/W
2188 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3270 points/W
909 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
471 points/W
92 points/W
TOTAL
17781 points/W
5594 points/W
Performance/GHz
7840HS
i7-12700H
Test#1 (Integers)
6190 points/GHz
8859 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4941 points/GHz
5422 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2436 points/GHz
2808 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4299 points/GHz
2724 points/GHz
TOTAL
17866 points/GHz
19813 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4