Ryzen 7 7840HS vs Core i7-1260P
Description
The 7840HS is based on Zen 4 architecture while the i7-1260P is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7840HS gets a score of 622.3 k points while the i7-1260P gets 391.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 7840HS is 1.6 times faster than the i7-1260P. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7840HS gets a score of 622.3 k points while the i7-1260P gets 391.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 7840HS is 1.6 times faster than the i7-1260P. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a70f41
906a3
Core
Phoenix
Alder Lake-P
Base frecuency
3.8 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.1 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP7r2
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
8/16
12/16
TDP
35 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32/8X64+4x48/8X32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
4x1280+8x2048 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
18432 kB
Date
January 2023
February 2022
Mean monothread perf.
91.11k points
94.9k points
Mean multithread perf.
622.34k points
391.07k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
7840HS
i7-1260P
Test#1 (Integers)
31.57k
41.94k (x1.33)
Test#2 (FP)
25.2k
26.81k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.42k
12.63k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.93k
13.51k (x0.62)
TOTAL
91.11k
94.9k (x1.04)
Multithread
7840HS
i7-1260P
Test#1 (Integers)
265.26k
168.12k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
226.13k
148.09k (x0.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
114.46k
60.28k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.49k
14.58k (x0.88)
TOTAL
622.34k
391.07k (x0.63)
Performance/W
7840HS
i7-1260P
Test#1 (Integers)
7579 points/W
6004 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6461 points/W
5289 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3270 points/W
2153 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
471 points/W
521 points/W
TOTAL
17781 points/W
13967 points/W
Performance/GHz
7840HS
i7-1260P
Test#1 (Integers)
6190 points/GHz
8924 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4941 points/GHz
5705 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2436 points/GHz
2687 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4299 points/GHz
2875 points/GHz
TOTAL
17866 points/GHz
20191 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4