Ryzen 7 7840HS vs Core i7-11700F
Description
The 7840HS is based on Zen 4 architecture while the i7-11700F is based on Rocket Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7840HS gets a score of 622.3 k points while the i7-11700F gets 512.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 7840HS is 1.2 times faster than the i7-11700F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7840HS gets a score of 622.3 k points while the i7-11700F gets 512.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 7840HS is 1.2 times faster than the i7-11700F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a70f41
a0671
Core
Phoenix
Rocket Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.8 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.1 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP7r2
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
16384 kB
Date
January 2023
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
91.11k points
89.58k points
Mean multithread perf.
622.34k points
512.32k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
7840HS
i7-11700F
Test#1 (Integers)
31.57k
32.55k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
25.2k
26.95k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.42k
10.76k (x0.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.93k
19.32k (x0.88)
TOTAL
91.11k
89.58k (x0.98)
Multithread
7840HS
i7-11700F
Test#1 (Integers)
265.26k
232.06k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
226.13k
203.56k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
114.46k
72.89k (x0.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.49k
3.81k (x0.23)
TOTAL
622.34k
512.32k (x0.82)
Performance/W
7840HS
i7-11700F
Test#1 (Integers)
7579 points/W
3570 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6461 points/W
3132 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3270 points/W
1121 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
471 points/W
59 points/W
TOTAL
17781 points/W
7882 points/W
Performance/GHz
7840HS
i7-11700F
Test#1 (Integers)
6190 points/GHz
6642 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4941 points/GHz
5500 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2436 points/GHz
2196 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4299 points/GHz
3943 points/GHz
TOTAL
17866 points/GHz
18281 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4