| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 5800H vs Core i7-9750H


Description
The 5800H is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i7-9750H is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5800H gets a score of 426.9 k points while the i7-9750H gets 276.5 k points.

Summarizing, the 5800H is 1.5 times faster than the i7-9750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a50f00
906ed
Core
Cezanne
Coffee Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.2 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
45 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
12288 kB
Date
February 2021
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
74.56k points
62.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
426.9k points
276.46k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
5800H
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
4.31k
4.53k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
17.51k
18.24k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.53k
5.76k (x0.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
23.57k
13.01k (x0.55)
TOTAL
55.92k
41.54k (x0.74)

Multithread

5800H

i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
24.18k
24.3k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
117.98k
97.88k (x0.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
70.96k
29.85k (x0.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.08k
11.93k (x1.48)
TOTAL
221.19k
163.95k (x0.74)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5800H
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
20.37k
25.22k (x1.24)
Test#2 (FP)
22.52k
21.97k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.18k
5.02k (x0.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.49k
10.71k (x0.5)
TOTAL
74.56k
62.92k (x0.84)

Multithread

5800H

i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
144.01k
125.56k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
191.86k
115.86k (x0.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
84.53k
25.63k (x0.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.5k
9.4k (x1.45)
TOTAL
426.9k
276.46k (x0.65)

Performance/W
5800H
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
3200 points/W
2790 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4264 points/W
2575 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1878 points/W
570 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
144 points/W
209 points/W
TOTAL
9487 points/W
6144 points/W

Performance/GHz
5800H
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
4630 points/GHz
5605 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5117 points/GHz
4882 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2314 points/GHz
1115 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4883 points/GHz
2380 points/GHz
TOTAL
16944 points/GHz
13982 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4