Ryzen 7 4800HS vs Core i9-10980XE
Description
The 4800HS is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i9-10980XE is based on Cascade Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4800HS gets a score of 427.6 k points while the i9-10980XE gets 1241.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10980XE is 2.9 times faster than the 4800HS. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4800HS gets a score of 427.6 k points while the i9-10980XE gets 1241.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10980XE is 2.9 times faster than the 4800HS. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
860f01
50657
Core
Renoir
Cascade Lake-X
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
LGA 2066
Cores/Threads
8/16
18/36
TDP
35 W
165 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
18x32+18x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
18x1024 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
25344 kB
Date
March 2020
November 2019
Mean monothread perf.
61.12k points
68.33k points
Mean multithread perf.
427.61k points
1241.12k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4800HS
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
16.66k
29.53k (x1.77)
Test#2 (FP)
26.01k
22.59k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.31k
5.99k (x0.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.15k
10.22k (x1.12)
TOTAL
61.12k
68.33k (x1.12)
Multithread
4800HS
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
144.48k
587.06k (x4.06)
Test#2 (FP)
192.46k
496.41k (x2.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
83.17k
134.66k (x1.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.51k
22.99k (x3.06)
TOTAL
427.61k
1241.12k (x2.9)
Performance/W
4800HS
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
4128 points/W
3558 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5499 points/W
3009 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2376 points/W
816 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
214 points/W
139 points/W
TOTAL
12218 points/W
7522 points/W
Performance/GHz
4800HS
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
3966 points/GHz
6153 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6194 points/GHz
4707 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2216 points/GHz
1248 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2177 points/GHz
2129 points/GHz
TOTAL
14553 points/GHz
14236 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4