Ryzen 7 4800HS vs Core i5-11400F
Description
The 4800HS is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i5-11400F is based on Rocket Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4800HS gets a score of 427.6 k points while the i5-11400F gets 495.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-11400F is 1.2 times faster than the 4800HS. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4800HS gets a score of 427.6 k points while the i5-11400F gets 495.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-11400F is 1.2 times faster than the 4800HS. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
860f01
a0671
Core
Renoir
Rocket Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1140
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32+6x48 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
2x4096 kB
12288 kB
Date
March 2020
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
61.12k points
88.34k points
Mean multithread perf.
427.61k points
495.65k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
4800HS
i5-11400F
Test#1 (Integers)
16.66k
31.66k (x1.9)
Test#2 (FP)
26.01k
26.21k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.31k
11.96k (x1.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.15k
18.5k (x2.02)
TOTAL
61.12k
88.34k (x1.45)
Multithread
4800HS
i5-11400F
Test#1 (Integers)
144.48k
210.36k (x1.46)
Test#2 (FP)
192.46k
203.84k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
83.17k
72.05k (x0.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.51k
9.4k (x1.25)
TOTAL
427.61k
495.65k (x1.16)
Performance/W
4800HS
i5-11400F
Test#1 (Integers)
4128 points/W
3236 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5499 points/W
3136 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2376 points/W
1108 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
214 points/W
145 points/W
TOTAL
12218 points/W
7625 points/W
Performance/GHz
4800HS
i5-11400F
Test#1 (Integers)
3966 points/GHz
7196 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6194 points/GHz
5957 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2216 points/GHz
2718 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2177 points/GHz
4205 points/GHz
TOTAL
14553 points/GHz
20076 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4