| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 3800X vs 6800H


Description
The 3800X is based on Zen 2 architecture while the 6800H is based on Zen 3+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3800X gets a score of 497.7 k points while the 6800H gets 478.7 k points.

Summarizing, the 3800X is 1 times faster than the 6800H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
870f10
a40f41
Core
Matisse
Rembrandt
Architecture
Zen 2
Base frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA-FP7
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
105 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
32768 kB
16384 kB
Date
July 2019
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
75.81k points
77.93k points
Mean multithread perf.
497.74k points
478.73k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3800X
6800H
Test#1 (Integers)
17.1k
21.04k (x1.23)
Test#2 (FP)
26.59k
22.41k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.91k
10.21k (x1.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
23.21k
24.27k (x1.05)
TOTAL
75.81k
77.93k (x1.03)

Multithread

3800X

6800H
Test#1 (Integers)
172.04k
158.65k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
214.03k
215.86k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
97.1k
89.45k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.57k
14.77k (x1.01)
TOTAL
497.74k
478.73k (x0.96)

Performance/W
3800X
6800H
Test#1 (Integers)
1638 points/W
3526 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2038 points/W
4797 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
925 points/W
1988 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
139 points/W
328 points/W
TOTAL
4740 points/W
10638 points/W

Performance/GHz
3800X
6800H
Test#1 (Integers)
3799 points/GHz
4477 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5909 points/GHz
4768 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1981 points/GHz
2173 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5158 points/GHz
5163 points/GHz
TOTAL
16847 points/GHz
16581 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4