Ryzen 7 3750H vs Core i5-1335U
Description
The 3750H is based on Zen+ architecture while the i5-1335U is based on Raptor Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3750H gets a score of 175.2 k points while the i5-1335U gets 282.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-1335U is 1.6 times faster than the 3750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3750H gets a score of 175.2 k points while the i5-1335U gets 282.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-1335U is 1.6 times faster than the 3750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
b06a3
Core
Picasso
Raptor Lake-U
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
1.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
4/8
10/12
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
2x32/8x64+2x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
2x1280/2x2048 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2019
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
46.91k points
92.46k points
Mean multithread perf.
175.18k points
282.25k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3750H
i5-1335U
Test#1 (Integers)
13.72k
37.94k (x2.77)
Test#2 (FP)
22.93k
26.18k (x1.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.99k
13.86k (x2.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.27k
14.48k (x2.75)
TOTAL
46.91k
92.46k (x1.97)
Multithread
3750H
i5-1335U
Test#1 (Integers)
50.54k
125.7k (x2.49)
Test#2 (FP)
93.33k
93.63k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
25.25k
46.18k (x1.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.07k
16.75k (x2.76)
TOTAL
175.18k
282.25k (x1.61)
Performance/W
3750H
i5-1335U
Test#1 (Integers)
1444 points/W
8380 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2667 points/W
6242 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
721 points/W
3079 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
173 points/W
1117 points/W
TOTAL
5005 points/W
18817 points/W
Performance/GHz
3750H
i5-1335U
Test#1 (Integers)
3430 points/GHz
8248 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5733 points/GHz
5692 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1248 points/GHz
3013 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1317 points/GHz
3147 points/GHz
TOTAL
11726 points/GHz
20100 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4