Ryzen 7 3700X vs Xeon Silver 4208
Description
The 3700X is based on Zen 2 architecture while the Silver 4208 is based on Cascade Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3700X gets a score of 483.5 k points while the Silver 4208 gets 311.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 3700X is 1.6 times faster than the Silver 4208. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3700X gets a score of 483.5 k points while the Silver 4208 gets 311.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 3700X is 1.6 times faster than the Silver 4208. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
870f10
50657
Core
Matisse
Cascade Lake-SP
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 3647
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
65 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
32768 kB
11264 kB
Date
July 2019
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
74.35k points
38.61k points
Mean multithread perf.
483.47k points
311.57k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3700X
Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
16.77k
16.86k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
26.29k
12.08k (x0.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.79k
3.37k (x0.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.51k
6.29k (x0.28)
TOTAL
74.35k
38.61k (x0.52)
Multithread
3700X
Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
167.94k
150.99k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
209.85k
118.54k (x0.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
94.41k
33.44k (x0.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.27k
8.6k (x0.76)
TOTAL
483.47k
311.57k (x0.64)
Performance/W
3700X
Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
2584 points/W
1776 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3228 points/W
1395 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1452 points/W
393 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
173 points/W
101 points/W
TOTAL
7438 points/W
3666 points/W
Performance/GHz
3700X
Silver 4208
Test#1 (Integers)
3811 points/GHz
5269 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5976 points/GHz
3776 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1997 points/GHz
1054 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5115 points/GHz
1966 points/GHz
TOTAL
16898 points/GHz
12065 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4