| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 3700X vs Core i5-9500


Description
The 3700X is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i5-9500 is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3700X gets a score of 483.5 k points while the i5-9500 gets 352.8 k points.

Summarizing, the 3700X is 1.4 times faster than the i5-9500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
870f10
906ea
Core
Matisse
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/6
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
32768 kB
9216 kB
Date
July 2019
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
74.35k points
73.65k points
Mean multithread perf.
483.47k points
352.84k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3700X
i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
16.77k
29.17k (x1.74)
Test#2 (FP)
26.29k
25.49k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.79k
5.84k (x0.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.51k
13.15k (x0.58)
TOTAL
74.35k
73.65k (x0.99)

Multithread

3700X

i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
167.94k
166.66k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
209.85k
146.9k (x0.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
94.41k
34.04k (x0.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.27k
5.25k (x0.47)
TOTAL
483.47k
352.84k (x0.73)

Performance/W
3700X
i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
2584 points/W
2564 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3228 points/W
2260 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1452 points/W
524 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
173 points/W
81 points/W
TOTAL
7438 points/W
5428 points/W

Performance/GHz
3700X
i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
3811 points/GHz
6629 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5976 points/GHz
5793 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1997 points/GHz
1327 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5115 points/GHz
2990 points/GHz
TOTAL
16898 points/GHz
16739 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4