Ryzen 7 3700X vs Core i5-11400F
Description
The 3700X is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i5-11400F is based on Rocket Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3700X gets a score of 483.5 k points while the i5-11400F gets 495.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-11400F is 1 times faster than the 3700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3700X gets a score of 483.5 k points while the i5-11400F gets 495.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-11400F is 1 times faster than the 3700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
870f10
a0671
Core
Matisse
Rocket Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32+6x48 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
32768 kB
12288 kB
Date
July 2019
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
74.35k points
88.34k points
Mean multithread perf.
483.47k points
495.65k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3700X
i5-11400F
Test#1 (Integers)
16.77k
31.66k (x1.89)
Test#2 (FP)
26.29k
26.21k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.79k
11.96k (x1.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.51k
18.5k (x0.82)
TOTAL
74.35k
88.34k (x1.19)
Multithread
3700X
i5-11400F
Test#1 (Integers)
167.94k
210.36k (x1.25)
Test#2 (FP)
209.85k
203.84k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
94.41k
72.05k (x0.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.27k
9.4k (x0.83)
TOTAL
483.47k
495.65k (x1.03)
Performance/W
3700X
i5-11400F
Test#1 (Integers)
2584 points/W
3236 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3228 points/W
3136 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1452 points/W
1108 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
173 points/W
145 points/W
TOTAL
7438 points/W
7625 points/W
Performance/GHz
3700X
i5-11400F
Test#1 (Integers)
3811 points/GHz
7196 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5976 points/GHz
5957 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1997 points/GHz
2718 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5115 points/GHz
4205 points/GHz
TOTAL
16898 points/GHz
20076 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4