Ryzen 7 2700X vs Core i3-10110U
Description
The 2700X is based on Zen+ architecture while the i3-10110U is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2700X gets a score of 431.1 k points while the i3-10110U gets 106.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 2700X is 4 times faster than the i3-10110U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2700X gets a score of 431.1 k points while the i3-10110U gets 106.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 2700X is 4 times faster than the i3-10110U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f82
806ec
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Comet Lake-U
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
8/16
2/4
TDP
105 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2018
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
64.83k points
56.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
431.14k points
106.58k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
2700X
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
4.25k
4.26k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
19.72k
15.48k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.84k
4.94k (x0.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.36k
4.31k (x0.2)
TOTAL
51.17k
28.98k (x0.57)
Multithread
2700X
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
35.04k
7.41k (x0.21)
Test#2 (FP)
181.42k
29.18k (x0.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
64.86k
10.26k (x0.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.21k
3.27k (x0.4)
TOTAL
289.54k
50.13k (x0.17)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
2700X
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
15.22k
14.3k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
24.12k
20.09k (x0.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.87k
5.23k (x0.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
21k
4.24k (x0.2)
TOTAL
66.21k
43.87k (x0.66)
Multithread
2700X
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
126.81k
25.51k (x0.2)
Test#2 (FP)
229.86k
41.33k (x0.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
61.74k
10.81k (x0.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.77k
3.21k (x0.33)
TOTAL
428.19k
80.85k (x0.19)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
2700X
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
14.44k
14.25k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
24.92k
21.55k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.8k
5.16k (x0.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.07k
4.26k (x0.22)
TOTAL
64.24k
45.22k (x0.7)
Multithread
2700X
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
122.01k
26.15k (x0.21)
Test#2 (FP)
220.34k
44.03k (x0.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
59.89k
10.71k (x0.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.9k
3.28k (x0.33)
TOTAL
412.13k
84.17k (x0.2)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2700X
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
15.34k
24.6k (x1.6)
Test#2 (FP)
25.75k
22.32k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.79k
5.02k (x0.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.95k
4.7k (x0.26)
TOTAL
64.83k
56.64k (x0.87)
Multithread
2700X
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
123.07k
47.98k (x0.39)
Test#2 (FP)
239.3k
44.28k (x0.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
60.6k
10.33k (x0.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.18k
3.98k (x0.49)
TOTAL
431.14k
106.58k (x0.25)
Performance/W
2700X
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
1172 points/W
3199 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2279 points/W
2952 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
577 points/W
689 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
78 points/W
265 points/W
TOTAL
4106 points/W
7105 points/W
Performance/GHz
2700X
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
3568 points/GHz
6001 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5987 points/GHz
5444 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1347 points/GHz
1225 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4175 points/GHz
1146 points/GHz
TOTAL
15078 points/GHz
13815 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4