| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 1700X vs Core i5-3570K


Description
The 1700X is based on Zen architecture while the i5-3570K is based on Ivy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1700X gets a score of 313.8 k points while the i5-3570K gets 120.2 k points.

Summarizing, the 1700X is 2.6 times faster than the i5-3570K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
800f11
306a9
Core
Summit Ridge
Ivy Bridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/4
TDP
95 W
77 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
4x32+x4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
6144 kB
Date
March 2017
April 2012
Mean monothread perf.
56.76k points
34.57k points
Mean multithread perf.
372.73k points
120.16k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
1700X
i5-3570K
Test#1 (Integers)
12.5k
12.55k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
22.92k
12.14k (x0.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.45k
4.9k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.72k
4.98k (x0.34)
TOTAL
55.59k
34.57k (x0.62)

Multithread

1700X

i5-3570K
Test#1 (Integers)
92.51k
47.53k (x0.51)
Test#2 (FP)
144.76k
46.16k (x0.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
54.43k
18.36k (x0.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.08k
8.1k (x0.37)
TOTAL
313.78k
120.16k (x0.38)

Performance/W
1700X
i5-3570K
Test#1 (Integers)
974 points/W
617 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1524 points/W
599 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
573 points/W
238 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
232 points/W
105 points/W
TOTAL
3303 points/W
1560 points/W

Performance/GHz
1700X
i5-3570K
Test#1 (Integers)
3289 points/GHz
3303 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6031 points/GHz
3194 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1435 points/GHz
1288 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3875 points/GHz
1310 points/GHz
TOTAL
14629 points/GHz
9096 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4