Ryzen 7 1700 vs Ryzen 3 3300U
Description
The 1700 is based on Zen architecture while the 3300U is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1700 gets a score of 333.3 k points while the 3300U gets 139.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 1700 is 2.4 times faster than the 3300U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1700 gets a score of 333.3 k points while the 3300U gets 139.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 1700 is 2.4 times faster than the 3300U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f11
810f81
Core
Summit Ridge
Picasso
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/4
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
March 2017
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
52.69k points
40.81k points
Mean multithread perf.
333.31k points
139.56k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1700
3300U
Test#1 (Integers)
12.65k
12k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
20.95k
19.55k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.63k
4.43k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.47k
4.83k (x0.33)
TOTAL
52.69k
40.81k (x0.77)
Multithread
1700
3300U
Test#1 (Integers)
101.78k
43.64k (x0.43)
Test#2 (FP)
177.57k
73.99k (x0.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
47.18k
17.03k (x0.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.78k
4.91k (x0.72)
TOTAL
333.31k
139.56k (x0.42)
Performance/W
1700
3300U
Test#1 (Integers)
1566 points/W
2909 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2732 points/W
4933 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
726 points/W
1135 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
104 points/W
327 points/W
TOTAL
5128 points/W
9304 points/W
Performance/GHz
1700
3300U
Test#1 (Integers)
3419 points/GHz
3430 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5661 points/GHz
5587 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1251 points/GHz
1266 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3911 points/GHz
1379 points/GHz
TOTAL
14241 points/GHz
11661 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4