| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 5500 vs Core i5-1035G4


Description
The 5500 is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i5-1035G4 is based on Ice Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5500 gets a score of 373 k points while the i5-1035G4 gets 142.7 k points.

Summarizing, the 5500 is 2.6 times faster than the i5-1035G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a50f00
706e5
Core
Cezanne
Ice Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2022
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
80.52k points
65.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
373.05k points
142.69k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
5500
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
15.32k
13.9k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
22.98k
20.13k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.3k
9.41k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.19k
10.59k (x0.5)
TOTAL
68.8k
54.03k (x0.79)

Multithread

5500

i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
80.25k
55.4k (x0.69)
Test#2 (FP)
163.59k
59.01k (x0.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
72.83k
22.83k (x0.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.34k
6.7k (x0.91)
TOTAL
324.01k
143.94k (x0.44)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5500
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
22.09k
25.53k (x1.16)
Test#2 (FP)
24.59k
19.99k (x0.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.94k
9.31k (x0.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.89k
10.81k (x0.47)
TOTAL
80.52k
65.64k (x0.82)

Multithread

5500

i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
124.44k
58.46k (x0.47)
Test#2 (FP)
167.06k
57.31k (x0.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
74.34k
20.1k (x0.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.2k
6.81k (x0.95)
TOTAL
373.05k
142.69k (x0.38)

Performance/W
5500
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
1914 points/W
3897 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2570 points/W
3821 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1144 points/W
1340 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
111 points/W
454 points/W
TOTAL
5739 points/W
9513 points/W

Performance/GHz
5500
i5-1035G4
Test#1 (Integers)
5261 points/GHz
6901 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5855 points/GHz
5401 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2604 points/GHz
2515 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5451 points/GHz
2922 points/GHz
TOTAL
19170 points/GHz
17739 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4