Ryzen 5 3550H vs Core i5-4590
Description
The 3550H is based on Zen+ architecture while the i5-4590 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3550H gets a score of 178.3 k points while the i5-4590 gets 144.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 3550H is 1.2 times faster than the i5-4590 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3550H gets a score of 178.3 k points while the i5-4590 gets 144.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 3550H is 1.2 times faster than the i5-4590 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
306c3
Core
Picasso
Haswell
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
35 W
84 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2019
June 2014
Mean monothread perf.
45.07k points
41.76k points
Mean multithread perf.
178.26k points
144.76k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3550H
i5-4590
Test#1 (Integers)
13.51k
21.17k (x1.57)
Test#2 (FP)
22.34k
11.52k (x0.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.98k
4.75k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.24k
4.32k (x1.02)
TOTAL
45.07k
41.76k (x0.93)
Multithread
3550H
i5-4590
Test#1 (Integers)
52.21k
77.73k (x1.49)
Test#2 (FP)
95.66k
42.15k (x0.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
25.54k
17.41k (x0.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.85k
7.47k (x1.54)
TOTAL
178.26k
144.76k (x0.81)
Performance/W
3550H
i5-4590
Test#1 (Integers)
1492 points/W
925 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2733 points/W
502 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
730 points/W
207 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
139 points/W
89 points/W
TOTAL
5093 points/W
1723 points/W
Performance/GHz
3550H
i5-4590
Test#1 (Integers)
3652 points/GHz
5723 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6038 points/GHz
3112 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1347 points/GHz
1284 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1145 points/GHz
1168 points/GHz
TOTAL
12182 points/GHz
11287 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4