Ryzen 5 3500X vs Core i9-13900K
Description
The 3500X is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i9-13900K is based on Raptor Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3500X gets a score of 373.6 k points while the i9-13900K gets 1763.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-13900K is 4.7 times faster than the 3500X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3500X gets a score of 373.6 k points while the i9-13900K gets 1763.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-13900K is 4.7 times faster than the 3500X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
870f10
b0671
Core
Matisse
Raptor Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
5.8 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
6/12
24/32
TDP
65 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
8x2048+4x4096 kB
Cache L3
32768 kB
36864 kB
Date
September 2019
October 2022
Mean monothread perf.
66.61k points
129.15k points
Mean multithread perf.
373.61k points
1763.08k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3500X
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
15.48k
58.6k (x3.79)
Test#2 (FP)
22.91k
33.29k (x1.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.1k
17.77k (x2.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.11k
19.49k (x0.92)
TOTAL
66.61k
129.15k (x1.94)
Multithread
3500X
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
90.39k
804.04k (x8.9)
Test#2 (FP)
139.1k
613.45k (x4.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
53.2k
311.08k (x5.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
90.92k
34.5k (x0.38)
TOTAL
373.61k
1763.08k (x4.72)
Performance/W
3500X
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
1391 points/W
6432 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2140 points/W
4908 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
818 points/W
2489 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
1399 points/W
276 points/W
TOTAL
5748 points/W
14105 points/W
Performance/GHz
3500X
i9-13900K
Test#1 (Integers)
3776 points/GHz
10104 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5588 points/GHz
5739 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1732 points/GHz
3064 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5149 points/GHz
3360 points/GHz
TOTAL
16246 points/GHz
22268 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4