Ryzen 5 2600X vs Core i5-1335U
Description
The 2600X is based on Zen+ architecture while the i5-1335U is based on Raptor Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2600X gets a score of 333.1 k points while the i5-1335U gets 282.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 2600X is 1.2 times faster than the i5-1335U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2600X gets a score of 333.1 k points while the i5-1335U gets 282.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 2600X is 1.2 times faster than the i5-1335U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f82
b06a3
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Raptor Lake-U
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
1.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.2 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
6/12
10/12
TDP
95 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
2x32/8x64+2x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
2x1280/2x2048 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2018
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
66.44k points
92.46k points
Mean multithread perf.
333.12k points
282.25k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2600X
i5-1335U
Test#1 (Integers)
15.75k
37.94k (x2.41)
Test#2 (FP)
26.29k
26.18k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.91k
13.86k (x2.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
18.48k
14.48k (x0.78)
TOTAL
66.44k
92.46k (x1.39)
Multithread
2600X
i5-1335U
Test#1 (Integers)
94.49k
125.7k (x1.33)
Test#2 (FP)
182.53k
93.63k (x0.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
45.95k
46.18k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.15k
16.75k (x1.65)
TOTAL
333.12k
282.25k (x0.85)
Performance/W
2600X
i5-1335U
Test#1 (Integers)
995 points/W
8380 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1921 points/W
6242 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
484 points/W
3079 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
107 points/W
1117 points/W
TOTAL
3507 points/W
18817 points/W
Performance/GHz
2600X
i5-1335U
Test#1 (Integers)
3749 points/GHz
8248 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6261 points/GHz
5692 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1408 points/GHz
3013 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4401 points/GHz
3147 points/GHz
TOTAL
15819 points/GHz
20100 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4