| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 2600 vs Core i9-9900K


Description
The 2600 is based on Zen+ architecture while the i9-9900K is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2600 gets a score of 291.5 k points while the i9-9900K gets 529.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-9900K is 1.8 times faster than the 2600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
800f82
906ed
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
65 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
16384 kB
Date
April 2018
October 2018
Mean monothread perf.
57.13k points
81.91k points
Mean multithread perf.
291.53k points
529.32k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
2600
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
3.41k
5k (x1.47)
Test#2 (FP)
15.96k
20.22k (x1.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.69k
6.54k (x1.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.42k
13.78k (x0.79)
TOTAL
41.47k
45.53k (x1.1)

Multithread

2600

i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
20.88k
36.39k (x1.74)
Test#2 (FP)
110.37k
166.55k (x1.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39.25k
54.92k (x1.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.66k
8.96k (x1.35)
TOTAL
177.16k
266.82k (x1.51)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2600
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
13.76k
32.08k (x2.33)
Test#2 (FP)
23.03k
28.17k (x1.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.12k
6.68k (x1.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.23k
14.98k (x0.98)
TOTAL
57.13k
81.91k (x1.43)

Multithread

2600

i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
83.23k
242.98k (x2.92)
Test#2 (FP)
161.06k
220.16k (x1.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
40.52k
53.97k (x1.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.73k
12.22k (x1.82)
TOTAL
291.53k
529.32k (x1.82)

Performance/W
2600
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
1281 points/W
2558 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2478 points/W
2317 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
623 points/W
568 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
103 points/W
129 points/W
TOTAL
4485 points/W
5572 points/W

Performance/GHz
2600
i9-9900K
Test#1 (Integers)
3529 points/GHz
6417 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5904 points/GHz
5634 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1313 points/GHz
1335 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3904 points/GHz
2996 points/GHz
TOTAL
14650 points/GHz
16382 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4