| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 2600 vs Ryzen 7 4800U


Description
The 2600 is based on Zen+ architecture while the 4800U is based on Zen 2.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2600 gets a score of 291.5 k points while the 4800U gets 356.8 k points.

Summarizing, the 4800U is 1.2 times faster than the 2600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
800f82
860f01
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Renoir
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
1.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
April 2018
January 2020
Mean monothread perf.
57.13k points
57.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
291.53k points
356.81k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2600
4800U
Test#1 (Integers)
13.76k
16.53k (x1.2)
Test#2 (FP)
23.03k
24.67k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.12k
9.04k (x1.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.23k
7.68k (x0.5)
TOTAL
57.13k
57.92k (x1.01)

Multithread

2600

4800U
Test#1 (Integers)
83.23k
121.96k (x1.47)
Test#2 (FP)
161.06k
162.82k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
40.52k
68.25k (x1.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.73k
3.79k (x0.56)
TOTAL
291.53k
356.81k (x1.22)

Performance/W
2600
4800U
Test#1 (Integers)
1281 points/W
8131 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2478 points/W
10854 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
623 points/W
4550 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
103 points/W
252 points/W
TOTAL
4485 points/W
23788 points/W

Performance/GHz
2600
4800U
Test#1 (Integers)
3529 points/GHz
3936 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5904 points/GHz
5873 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1313 points/GHz
2153 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3904 points/GHz
1828 points/GHz
TOTAL
14650 points/GHz
13790 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4