Ryzen 5 2600 vs 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
Description
The 2600 is based on Zen+ architecture while the 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2600 gets a score of 291.5 k points while the 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition gets 327.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition is 1.1 times faster than the 2600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2600 gets a score of 291.5 k points while the 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition gets 327.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 4680U Microsoft Surface Edition is 1.1 times faster than the 2600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f82
860f01
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Renoir
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
April 2018
April 2021
Mean monothread perf.
57.13k points
55.74k points
Mean multithread perf.
291.53k points
327.72k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2600
4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
13.76k
15.5k (x1.13)
Test#2 (FP)
23.03k
22.96k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.12k
8.78k (x1.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.23k
8.5k (x0.56)
TOTAL
57.13k
55.74k (x0.98)
Multithread
2600
4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
83.23k
110.78k (x1.33)
Test#2 (FP)
161.06k
149.38k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
40.52k
60.88k (x1.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.73k
6.68k (x0.99)
TOTAL
291.53k
327.72k (x1.12)
Performance/W
2600
4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
1281 points/W
7386 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2478 points/W
9959 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
623 points/W
4059 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
103 points/W
445 points/W
TOTAL
4485 points/W
21848 points/W
Performance/GHz
2600
4680U Microsoft Surface Edition
Test#1 (Integers)
3529 points/GHz
3876 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5904 points/GHz
5739 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1313 points/GHz
2195 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3904 points/GHz
2125 points/GHz
TOTAL
14650 points/GHz
13935 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4