Ryzen 5 2400G vs Ryzen 7 1700
Description
Both models 2400G and 1700 are based on Zen architecture.
Zen is the first Ryzen generation. It uses 14nm FinFET process from GlobalFoundries. It has support for DDR4 memory and ECC. Comes with 64kB instruction + 32kB data L1 cache and 512kB L2 cache per core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2400G gets a score of 198.3 k points while the 1700 gets 333.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 1700 is 1.7 times faster than the 2400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Zen is the first Ryzen generation. It uses 14nm FinFET process from GlobalFoundries. It has support for DDR4 memory and ECC. Comes with 64kB instruction + 32kB data L1 cache and 512kB L2 cache per core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2400G gets a score of 198.3 k points while the 1700 gets 333.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 1700 is 1.7 times faster than the 2400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f10
800f11
Core
Raven Ridge
Summit Ridge
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
AM4
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
January 2018
March 2017
Mean monothread perf.
47.96k points
52.69k points
Mean multithread perf.
198.27k points
333.31k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
2400G
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
13.04k
13.95k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
22.35k
22.02k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.37k
5.17k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.4k
16.61k (x4.89)
TOTAL
44.15k
57.75k (x1.31)
Multithread
2400G
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
56.49k
120.59k (x2.13)
Test#2 (FP)
100.74k
197.34k (x1.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.21k
56.83k (x2.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.04k
6.41k (x2.11)
TOTAL
188.49k
381.16k (x2.02)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2400G
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
14.2k
12.65k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
23.23k
20.95k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.35k
4.63k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.18k
14.47k (x2.8)
TOTAL
47.96k
52.69k (x1.1)
Multithread
2400G
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
58.24k
101.78k (x1.75)
Test#2 (FP)
105.72k
177.57k (x1.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.73k
47.18k (x1.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.59k
6.78k (x1.21)
TOTAL
198.27k
333.31k (x1.68)
Performance/W
2400G
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
896 points/W
1566 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1626 points/W
2732 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
442 points/W
726 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
86 points/W
104 points/W
TOTAL
3050 points/W
5128 points/W
Performance/GHz
2400G
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
3641 points/GHz
3419 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5957 points/GHz
5661 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1372 points/GHz
1251 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1327 points/GHz
3911 points/GHz
TOTAL
12298 points/GHz
14241 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4