Ryzen 5 1600X vs Core i5-10400
Description
The 1600X is based on Zen architecture while the i5-10400 is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1600X gets a score of 173.2 k points while the i5-10400 gets 372.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400 is 2.1 times faster than the 1600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1600X gets a score of 173.2 k points while the i5-10400 gets 372.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400 is 2.1 times faster than the 1600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f11
a0655
Core
Summit Ridge
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
95 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2017
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
60.09k points
68.04k points
Mean multithread perf.
173.2k points
372.19k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1600X
i5-10400
Test#1 (Integers)
14.63k
26.43k (x1.81)
Test#2 (FP)
24.09k
23.89k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.51k
5.63k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.86k
12.1k (x0.76)
TOTAL
60.09k
68.04k (x1.13)
Multithread
1600X
i5-10400
Test#1 (Integers)
48.75k
163.14k (x3.35)
Test#2 (FP)
80.1k
161.5k (x2.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.5k
39.94k (x1.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.85k
7.6k (x0.38)
TOTAL
173.2k
372.19k (x2.15)
Performance/W
1600X
i5-10400
Test#1 (Integers)
513 points/W
2510 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
843 points/W
2485 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
258 points/W
615 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
209 points/W
117 points/W
TOTAL
1823 points/W
5726 points/W
Performance/GHz
1600X
i5-10400
Test#1 (Integers)
3659 points/GHz
6146 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6022 points/GHz
5555 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1378 points/GHz
1309 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3966 points/GHz
2814 points/GHz
TOTAL
15023 points/GHz
15824 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4