Ryzen 5 1600X vs Core i9-13900HX
Description
The 1600X is based on Zen architecture while the i9-13900HX is based on Raptor Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1600X gets a score of 173.2 k points while the i9-13900HX gets 885.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-13900HX is 5.1 times faster than the 1600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1600X gets a score of 173.2 k points while the i9-13900HX gets 885.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-13900HX is 5.1 times faster than the 1600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f11
b0671
Core
Summit Ridge
Raptor Lake-HX
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
5.4 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1964
Cores/Threads
6/12
24/32
TDP
95 W
55 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
8x2048/4x4096 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
36864 kB
Date
April 2017
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
60.09k points
110.99k points
Mean multithread perf.
173.2k points
885.37k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1600X
i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
14.63k
53.97k (x3.69)
Test#2 (FP)
24.09k
28.92k (x1.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.51k
12.85k (x2.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.86k
15.25k (x0.96)
TOTAL
60.09k
110.99k (x1.85)
Multithread
1600X
i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
48.75k
374.2k (x7.68)
Test#2 (FP)
80.1k
331.24k (x4.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
24.5k
164.06k (x6.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.85k
15.87k (x0.8)
TOTAL
173.2k
885.37k (x5.11)
Performance/W
1600X
i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
513 points/W
6804 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
843 points/W
6023 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
258 points/W
2983 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
209 points/W
289 points/W
TOTAL
1823 points/W
16098 points/W
Performance/GHz
1600X
i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
3659 points/GHz
9994 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6022 points/GHz
5355 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1378 points/GHz
2380 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3966 points/GHz
2825 points/GHz
TOTAL
15023 points/GHz
20553 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4