Ryzen 3 3200U vs A9 9425
Description
The 3200U is based on Zen+ architecture while the 9425 is based on Excavator.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200U gets a score of 61.2 k points while the 9425 gets 41.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 3200U is 1.5 times faster than the 9425. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200U gets a score of 61.2 k points while the 9425 gets 41.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 3200U is 1.5 times faster than the 9425. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
670f00
Core
Picasso
Stoney Ridge
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
BGA-FP4
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/2
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x64+2x32 kB
96+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x512 kB
1024 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
0 kB
Date
January 2019
May 2018
Mean monothread perf.
38.85k points
31.31k points
Mean multithread perf.
61.23k points
41.73k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3200U
9425
Test#1 (Integers)
11.13k
11.23k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
19.38k
14.7k (x0.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.47k
3.15k (x0.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.87k
2.24k (x0.58)
TOTAL
38.85k
31.31k (x0.81)
Multithread
3200U
9425
Test#1 (Integers)
17.13k
16.58k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
30.56k
17.84k (x0.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.44k
5.09k (x0.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.09k
2.23k (x0.54)
TOTAL
61.23k
41.73k (x0.68)
Performance/W
3200U
9425
Test#1 (Integers)
1142 points/W
1105 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2038 points/W
1189 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
629 points/W
339 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
273 points/W
148 points/W
TOTAL
4082 points/W
2782 points/W
Performance/GHz
3200U
9425
Test#1 (Integers)
3181 points/GHz
3034 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5536 points/GHz
3972 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1277 points/GHz
850 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1105 points/GHz
605 points/GHz
TOTAL
11099 points/GHz
8461 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4