| | | | | | |

Ryzen 3 3200G vs Virtual CPU Version 2.5


Description
The 3200G is based on Zen+ architecture while the Version 2.5 is based on -.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200G gets a score of 165.9 k points while the Version 2.5 gets 85.7 k points.

Summarizing, the 3200G is 1.9 times faster than the Version 2.5. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f81
663
Core
Picasso
-
Architecture
Zen+
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
4.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
AM4
-
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
65 W
- W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
- kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
- kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
- kB
Date
July 2019
-
Mean monothread perf.
49.21k points
56.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
168.69k points
85.75k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
3200G
Version 2.5
Test#1 (Integers)
14.3k
15.7k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
21.69k
22.8k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.42k
5.61k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.6k
12.05k (x1.83)
TOTAL
48k
56.16k (x1.17)

Multithread

3200G

Version 2.5
Test#1 (Integers)
55.45k
28.49k (x0.51)
Test#2 (FP)
83.13k
37.67k (x0.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.76k
10.09k (x0.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.58k
9.5k (x1.44)
TOTAL
165.91k
85.75k (x0.52)

Performance/W
3200G
Version 2.5
Test#1 (Integers)
853 points/W