Ryzen 3 3200G vs Xeon E5-2670 v3
Description
The 3200G is based on Zen+ architecture while the E5-2670 v3 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200G gets a score of 168.7 k points while the E5-2670 v3 gets 452.9 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2670 v3 is 2.7 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3200G gets a score of 168.7 k points while the E5-2670 v3 gets 452.9 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2670 v3 is 2.7 times faster than the 3200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
306f2
Core
Picasso
Haswell-EP
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
4/4
12/24
TDP
65 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
12x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
30720 kB
Date
July 2019
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
49.21k points
36.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
168.69k points
452.9k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3200G
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
3.89k
3.52k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
17.94k
8.68k (x0.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.34k
2.83k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.62k
3.13k (x0.47)
TOTAL
33.79k
18.17k (x0.54)
Multithread
3200G
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
15.07k
32.7k (x2.17)
Test#2 (FP)
66.84k
105.18k (x1.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.56k
35.18k (x1.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.54k
9.54k (x1.46)
TOTAL
108.01k
182.59k (x1.69)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
3200G
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
14.3k
11.08k (x0.77)
Test#2 (FP)
21.69k
9.57k (x0.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.42k
3.18k (x0.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.6k
3.28k (x0.5)
TOTAL
48k
27.11k (x0.56)
Multithread
3200G
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
55.45k
139.07k (x2.51)
Test#2 (FP)
83.13k
133.47k (x1.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.76k
46.6k (x2.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.58k
6.65k (x1.01)
TOTAL
165.91k
325.78k (x1.96)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
3200G
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
13.05k
11.18k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
22.88k
10.06k (x0.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.39k
3.21k (x0.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.31k
3.12k (x0.43)
TOTAL
48.63k
27.57k (x0.57)
Multithread
3200G
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
51.73k
140.98k (x2.73)
Test#2 (FP)
87.74k
145.37k (x1.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.74k
45.62k (x2.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.57k
6.75k (x1.03)
TOTAL
166.79k
338.73k (x2.03)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3200G
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
14.48k
18.62k (x1.29)
Test#2 (FP)
23.84k
10.49k (x0.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.43k
4.04k (x0.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.46k
3.26k (x0.6)
TOTAL
49.21k
36.41k (x0.74)
Multithread
3200G
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
54.39k
236.25k (x4.34)
Test#2 (FP)
88.77k
151.05k (x1.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.04k
58.9k (x2.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.48k
6.7k (x1.22)
TOTAL
168.69k
452.9k (x2.68)
Performance/W
3200G
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
837 points/W
1969 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1366 points/W
1259 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
308 points/W
491 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
84 points/W
56 points/W
TOTAL
2595 points/W
3774 points/W
Performance/GHz
3200G
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
3619 points/GHz
6006 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5961 points/GHz
3385 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1357 points/GHz
1303 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1365 points/GHz
1052 points/GHz
TOTAL
12302 points/GHz
11745 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4