Ryzen 3 1200 vs Core i5-8250U
Description
The 1200 is based on Zen architecture while the i5-8250U is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1200 gets a score of 117.8 k points while the i5-8250U gets 153.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-8250U is 1.3 times faster than the 1200. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 1200 gets a score of 117.8 k points while the i5-8250U gets 153.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-8250U is 1.3 times faster than the 1200. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f11
806ea
Core
Summit Ridge
Kaby Lake-R
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
6144 kB
Date
July 2017
August 2017
Mean monothread perf.
37.55k points
53.8k points
Mean multithread perf.
117.81k points
153.5k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
1200
i5-8250U
Test#1 (Integers)
11.73k
22k (x1.88)
Test#2 (FP)
18.85k
19.55k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.22k
4.41k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.76k
7.83k (x2.84)
TOTAL
37.55k
53.8k (x1.43)
Multithread
1200
i5-8250U
Test#1 (Integers)
38.56k
70.15k (x1.82)
Test#2 (FP)
62.21k
63.27k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.7k
15.29k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.33k
4.8k (x1.44)
TOTAL
117.81k
153.5k (x1.3)
Performance/W
1200
i5-8250U
Test#1 (Integers)
593 points/W
4676 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
957 points/W
4218 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
211 points/W
1019 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
51 points/W
320 points/W
TOTAL
1812 points/W
10233 points/W
Performance/GHz
1200
i5-8250U
Test#1 (Integers)
3449 points/GHz
6471 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5544 points/GHz
5750 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1242 points/GHz
1298 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
810 points/GHz
2304 points/GHz
TOTAL
11045 points/GHz
15823 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4