FX 8320 vs Core i5-7200U
Description
The 8320 is based on Piledriver architecture while the i5-7200U is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 8320 gets a score of 103.2 k points while the i5-7200U gets 80.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 8320 is 1.3 times faster than the i5-7200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 8320 gets a score of 103.2 k points while the i5-7200U gets 80.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 8320 is 1.3 times faster than the i5-7200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
600f20
806e9
Core
Vishera
Kaby Lake-U
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
Socket AM3+
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
8/8
2/4
TDP
125 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x2048 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
3072 kB
Date
October 2012
August 2016
Mean monothread perf.
16.68k points
44.94k points
Mean multithread perf.
103.21k points
97.52k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
8320
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
5.35k
11.36k (x2.12)
Test#2 (FP)
5.14k
17.26k (x3.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.15k
4.03k (x1.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.04k
4.77k (x1.18)
TOTAL
16.68k
37.42k (x2.24)
Multithread
8320
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
36.79k
24.08k (x0.65)
Test#2 (FP)
40.2k
41.23k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.57k
10.19k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.66k
4.72k (x0.71)
TOTAL
103.21k
80.22k (x0.78)
Performance/W
8320
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
294 points/W
1605 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
322 points/W
2749 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
157 points/W
679 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
53 points/W
315 points/W
TOTAL
826 points/W
5348 points/W
Performance/GHz
8320
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
1339 points/GHz
3666 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1285 points/GHz
5569 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
537 points/GHz
1300 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1010 points/GHz
1537 points/GHz
TOTAL
4171 points/GHz
12072 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4