A9 9420 vs A4 6300B
Description
The 9420 is based on Excavator architecture while the 6300B is based on Piledriver.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9420 gets a score of 26.2 k points while the 6300B gets 27.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 6300B is 1 times faster than the 9420. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9420 gets a score of 26.2 k points while the 6300B gets 27.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 6300B is 1 times faster than the 9420. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
670f00
610f31
Core
Stoney Ridge
Richland
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
Micro-BGA
Socket FM2
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
96+2x32 kB
2x16+64 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
1024 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
kB
Date
April 2017
December 2013
Mean monothread perf.
33.09k points
20.11k points
Mean multithread perf.
46.33k points
27.54k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
9420
6300B
Test#1 (Integers)
7.55k
8.35k (x1.11)
Test#2 (FP)
13.9k
7.31k (x0.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.11k
2.95k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.18k
1.51k (x0.69)
TOTAL
26.74k
20.11k (x0.75)
Multithread
9420
6300B
Test#1 (Integers)
9.09k
10.88k (x1.2)
Test#2 (FP)
12.25k
10.01k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3k
5.02k (x1.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.81k
1.63k (x0.9)
TOTAL
26.15k
27.54k (x1.05)
Performance/W
9420
6300B
Test#1 (Integers)
606 points/W
167 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
817 points/W
154 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
200 points/W
77 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
120 points/W
25 points/W
TOTAL
1743 points/W
424 points/W
Performance/GHz
9420
6300B
Test#1 (Integers)
2096 points/GHz
2140 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3862 points/GHz
1873 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
864 points/GHz
756 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
604 points/GHz
387 points/GHz
TOTAL
7427 points/GHz
5157 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4