A9 9420 vs A4 5000
Description
The 9420 is based on Excavator architecture while the 5000 is based on Jaguar.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9420 gets a score of 26.2 k points while the 5000 gets 24.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 9420 is 1.1 times faster than the 5000. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9420 gets a score of 26.2 k points while the 5000 gets 24.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 9420 is 1.1 times faster than the 5000. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
670f00
700f01
Core
Stoney Ridge
Kabini
Base frecuency
3 GHz
1.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
1.5 GHz
Socket
Micro-BGA
Socket FT3
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
96+2x32 kB
kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
2048 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
kB
Date
April 2017
May 2013
Mean monothread perf.
33.09k points
7.38k points
Mean multithread perf.
46.33k points
24.71k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
9420
5000
Test#1 (Integers)
7.55k
2.58k (x0.34)
Test#2 (FP)
13.9k
2.43k (x0.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.11k
1.39k (x0.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.18k
0.98k (x0.45)
TOTAL
26.74k
7.38k (x0.28)
Multithread
9420
5000
Test#1 (Integers)
9.09k
9.55k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
12.25k
8.66k (x0.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3k
5.06k (x1.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.81k
1.45k (x0.8)
TOTAL
26.15k
24.71k (x0.94)
Performance/W
9420
5000
Test#1 (Integers)
606 points/W
637 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
817 points/W
577 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
200 points/W
337 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
120 points/W
96 points/W
TOTAL
1743 points/W
1647 points/W
Performance/GHz
9420
5000
Test#1 (Integers)
2096 points/GHz
1721 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3862 points/GHz
1620 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
864 points/GHz
926 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
604 points/GHz
650 points/GHz
TOTAL
7427 points/GHz
4917 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4