A10 9630P vs Core E5-2620 v3
Description
The 9630P is based on Excavator architecture while the E5-2620 v3 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9630P gets a score of 32.9 k points while the E5-2620 v3 gets 358 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v3 is 10.9 times faster than the 9630P. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 9630P gets a score of 32.9 k points while the E5-2620 v3 gets 358 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v3 is 10.9 times faster than the 9630P. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
660f51
306f2
Core
Bristol Ridge
Haswell-EP
Base frecuency
2.6 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
Socket FP4
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
4/4
6/12
TDP
45 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x96+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
15360 kB
Date
June 2016
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
23.7k points
35.86k points
Mean multithread perf.
32.92k points
357.99k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
9630P
E5-2620 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
8.52k
18.64k (x2.19)
Test#2 (FP)
11.04k
10.55k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.36k
4.12k (x1.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.79k
2.54k (x1.42)
TOTAL
23.7k
35.86k (x1.51)
Multithread
9630P
E5-2620 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
12.83k
181.66k (x14.16)
Test#2 (FP)
14.44k
122.09k (x8.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.6k
47.02k (x13.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.05k
7.22k (x3.52)
TOTAL
32.92k
357.99k (x10.87)
Performance/W
9630P
E5-2620 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
285 points/W
2137 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
321 points/W
1436 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
80 points/W
553 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
46 points/W
85 points/W
TOTAL
732 points/W
4212 points/W
Performance/GHz
9630P
E5-2620 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
2582 points/GHz
5826 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3344 points/GHz
3297 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
714 points/GHz
1288 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
543 points/GHz
794 points/GHz
TOTAL
7183 points/GHz
11205 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4